Monday, February 22, 2010

Fraternity

Friendship and companionship are in very hot water.

People have given themselves over to television and other modern electronic devices (computer games, internet, video games, and who knows what is next). The time they give to this came, statistically, out of our social time - the time we spent doing things with other people (for a proof of this see the excellent book Bowling Alone by Robert D. Putnam).

Even when our electronic activities have a social element (social networking, dating, chat, e-mail, etc.), our time with our friends and the friendships we form are often not as good as a more ordinary friendship.

Fraternity is in hot water.

Psychology created the group "homosexual" (prior to this the subject of orientation was much more vague and less on our minds) many years ago, and, generations ago, Western governments slowly stopped enforcing anti-gay laws and slowly started repealing them.

One of the pressures against fraternity is our extreme homophobia. With homosexual activity now legal, many men would never do what men naturally did one or two hundred years ago. Sleeping together in the same bed was commonplace. Swimming nude together was very common in many cultures. Touching - arms around each other, sitting side by side and the like - was the norm, not the exception. Social analysts are still trying to explain why from around 1908 to around 1918 we see men in the USA (and elsewhere, though I don't know if the time-frame was the same) stop touching each other all the time and start avoiding body contact.

A pressure against body contact in that era was the spread of an understanding of germ theory - kids were no longer in the parental bed or group beds if a family could afford individual beds. Bed advertisements warned that you did not want to breath the germs of another person...

Prior to these events, whatever their cause, men in many Western cultures tended, at times, to form very strong male friendships and to engage in very male activities with friends and in groups. Fraternity ruled.

When Fraternity ruled, life as a child was like this:

From a little boy you longed to enter manhood.
If well-connected, you might become a page to an aristrocrat.
From an early age you would work, and people would know you from your accomplishments.
If well-to-do, you might have a tutor.
Your childhood might have privation, but it also might have unbelievable adventure, life outdoors or in the streets (some bad, some good there). Read memoirs of people who had real childhoods. It was much more dangerous back then, but parents still tended to let their young ones experience the real world.
You might be able to secure an apprenticeship from a young age.

In such an environment, there was culture, children were a part of culture, older persons passed the culture onto children, and so on.

Around 1900, I don't know exactly when, "safety first" became a concern. While it is wonderful that we are safer now, in some ways, this has caused massive changes:

Kids used to drown in rivers and other bodies of water all the time. That is what kids do. It wouldn't even be very newsworthy.

Kids, sadly, disappeared.

But the safety precautions we have implemented have, of course, gone way too far.

I knew of kids who NEVER left their yard unless escorted.

There are kids with no social skills, almost no friends, possibly destined for isolation and abnormality. Now I accept that some great people were isolated as children, but does that have to be the norm?

And when Fraternity ruled, the number of things that men did together as men, or together with boys or the boys, was legion.

One issue that my writing and my other blog try to address is, males are handsome or beautiful in their own ways. Homophobia and fear of being labeled a pedophile mean that males very much keep their distance from the concept that males are good looking.

For some, this is wise, but it tends to go too far.

Men who worked with kids 100 years ago could openly talk about how good looking the kids were. Lord Baden-Powell, founder of the Boy Scouts, made it well-known that he wanted his visits to camps to coincide with their (nude) swim time. He considered his interest to be sentimentalism, and it probably was!

I worked extensively with children years ago, and (though not everyone is the same), I could see their beauty without wanting to destroy their beauty. Without wanting to abuse them, cause tension in our relationship, defeat all I was working to do for them, and probably end up in prison or worse.

On this aspect of fraternity, intergenerational relationships, let me add that you must not only be trustworthy, but you must also engineer a safe environment. There was one young man who was sexually precocious. I told his custodian on the very first day we met that I never wanted him to spend the night. I just knew I should take that precaution. There are tons of precautions that parents, mentors, coaches, teachers, etc., should take, for all people, male and female, are sexually risky. Even grandmothers have been known to be a bit weird at times! And some of the very worst offenders have themselves been but children at the time of the offense. Please, be safe, but do not sacrifice fraternity.

Why fraternity? If I can like another male, it helps me somewhat accept myself, as well (I am male). It helps to make life worth living. Friendship. Companionship. Comrades.

Not many years ago, men being friends with other men was openly considered one of the most important things in life.

Now people in generations age 30 and up cannot even talk about it.

We have killed fraternity. We have killed our culture.

Hunting down every man who even looks with awe at the beauty of a child or youth (which is 90% of men), we make it harder for fraternity to revive. Why? Because we are demonize all men and we are even, though we do not realize it, making it uncomfortable to be a boy (or a girl) or to even raise children (or help others raise children, such as by coaching, teaching, babysitting, etc.).

In the end, boys won't want to be men. Talk to young people. Many look down on older people now more than ever before, and, rather than looking forward to maturity and success, they only fear growing old and growing ugly.

Fraternity is dead.

Let's start a new fraternity, a fraternity alive!

3 comments:

  1. Very interesting post! and new blog!

    You raise a lot of interesting points about fraternity among men.

    C. A. Tripp wrote a book The Intimate World of Abraham Lincoln in which he postulates that Lincoln was homosexual because he was a frequent bedmate with his associate Joshua Speed for 4 years. But a Washington Post review states: "To take another example, Tripp is struck by the fact that Lincoln, as a young state legislator, shared a bed for four years with his best friend, Joshua Speed. When Speed moved home to Kentucky in 1841 and Lincoln's engagement to Mary Todd came temporarily to an end, Lincoln suffered an emotional crisis. The two men subsequently exchanged a series of letters, some of which Lincoln ended with "Yours forever." All of this leads Tripp to conclude that Lincoln and Speed conducted a passionate homosexual affair. But 19th-century notions of privacy were vastly different from our own, and mattresses were in short supply. During two of their four years as bedmates, Lincoln and Speed shared the room with two other young men, both of them decidedly heterosexual."

    Now that I am 67, I look back at the 1950s and even see the semblance of fraternity then. When we swam at the YMCA, we all swam nude whether boys or adult men. You can read a discussion of this at http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TL1Q54NU3M3RBGI58. Boys also were required to take communal showers in grades 9-12. For some odd reason, this would be unconscienable today as we seem to get more and more prudish. Perhaps this is a result of the USA moving back toward ultra-conservatism thanks to the right-wing religious movement.

    I also agree with you about the safety issue. Can you imagine a bunch of kids riding in the back of a big truck filled with hay (hayride) on the way to a bonfire in the autumn?

    Fraternity is indeed dead, but I am afraid that we won't be able to revive it unless we become more secular as a society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love this!

    Your comment on my blog has engendered another BLOG!!

    Bless your Heart.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow! For one like myself, who has studied rather deeply into the psychology of boys ( might I recommend "Real Boys: Rescuing Our Sons From the Myths of Boyhood by Dr. Pollack), I think much of what you have said is right on the money! Wow, I look forward to more posts like this, and your thoughts.

    I wish we could go back, as a society, to true boyhood and manhood. I feel that in certain cases, we can and are, and for that I am thankful.

    ReplyDelete